Lecture 30

[[lecture-data]]

2024-11-11

Nearing the end of:

5. Chapter 5

Last time, we saw how condition number determines the amount of noise in a linear system. We also saw a similar thing when we are inverting a matrix with some noise thrown in!

Absolute Vector Norm

The vector norm on Cn is called absolute precisely when for all xCn it holds that

|||x|||=||x||

where |x| is taken component wise

Example

All p norms are absolute since p(x)=(|x|p)1/p

(see absolute vector norm)

Monotone Vector Norm

We call a vector norm monotone precisely when for all x,yCn,

|x||y|||x||||y||

again, where |x| is taken component wise.

Example

All p norms are also monotone!

(see monotone vector norm)

Theorem

Suppose |||| is a norm on Cn. The following are equivalent:

  1. |||| is monotone
  2. |||| is absolute
  3. The matrix norm |||| induced by |||| satisfies the following: for all diagonal DMn
||D||=max{|dii|}

this is called the "funky diagonal property" 😊

Example

Proof

(1)(2)

Suppose |||| is monotone. For all xCn, we have that |x|||x||||x|||x||||x|||=||x||

(2)(1)

Read the book :)

(1)(3)

Suppose |||| is monotone. Let DMn be diagonal. For any xCn0, Dx=[d11x1d22x2dnnxn]. So |Dx||maxi|dii|x|.
So by monotonicity, we have

=maxi|dii|||x||||Dx||||x||maxi|d|

Equality is attained with x=ek the standard basis vector with 1 in the kth position, and where k is the index of the largest |di,i|. Thus we get

||D||:=max||Dx||||x||=maxi|dii|

(3)(1)

Suppose |||| induces |||| with the funky diagonal property. Suppose x,yCn such that |x|y. We define the following diagonal matrix D:

  • for i=1,2,,n, let dii={xiyiif yi00if yi=0
    So, Dy=x and ||D||=maxi|dii|1. So
||x||=||Dy||()||D||||y||()||y||

Where () is by definition of the induced matrix norm and () is because ||D||1.

And the result follows!

Thus the result follows :)

(see funky diagonal property)

Berer-Fike Theorem

Let |||| be a matrix norm on Mn induced by a monotone vector norm. Let A,ΔAMn be such that A is diagonalizable as A=SDS1.

Then for all λσ(A+ΔA), there exists a τσ(A) such that |λτ|||ΔA||κ||||(S)

If A is also normal, then ||λτ||||ΔA||2,2

Proof

Assume λσ(A). (otherwise, the result is trivial).
λI[A+ΔA] is singular (since λ is an eigenvalue of A+ΔA). So
S1[λI[A+ΔA]]S is also singular. But note that λID is invertible (since λσ(A)) and this inverse has diagonal entries 1λdii.

S1[λI[A+ΔA]]S=λIDS1ΔAS(λID)1[λIDS1ΔAS]=I[λID]1S1ΔAS is singular1||(λID)1S1ΔAS||()1||(λID)1||||S1ΔAS||=1|λτ|||S1AS||()

If A is normal, then S can be chosen to be unitary! So

||S||2,22=ρ(SS)=ρ(I)=1

So κ||||2,2(S)=11=1

(see Berer-Fike Theorem)

Note

If A,ΔA are hermitian, Weyl's Theorem says

λ1(ΔA)+λk(A)λk(A+ΔA)λn(ΔA)+λk(A)λ1(ΔA)λk(A+ΔA)λk(A)λn(A)|λk(A+ΔA)λk(A)|ρ(ΔA)||ΔA||2,2

ie, we can say WHICH eigenvalue each eigenvalue of the perturbed matrix is "close to"